6 ms·
This DC cost $100 million. Not exactly pocket change. http://www.coindesk.com/bitfury-details-100-million-georgia-data-center/ http://www.coindesk.com/bitfury-d
by cgjaro 11y ago
This DC cost $100 million. Not exactly pocket change. http://www.coindesk.com/bitfury-details-100-million-georgia-data-center/ http://www.coindesk.com/bitfury-details-100-million-georgia-...
Plus, with BitFury online, the cost of a 51% attack just raised to $200 million.
The only reason it is (currently, for a short time) hypothetically possible to 51%-attack the network with a budget in the low hundreds of million of dollars is because most of the miners are not using such efficient 16 nm chips. As the market migrate to these last generation chips, expect the cost to increase to $1+ billion in the next year.
- sanswork 11y agoOr you could just buy bit fury
- gcr 11y agoYeah, but how many bitcoins is USD$ 100 million worth?
- ragnar123 11y ago229922 BTC according to Google's exchange rates. See: https://www.google.com/search?q=100M+usd+in+bitcoin https://www.google.com/search?q=100M+usd+in+bitcoin
- Sealy 11y agoPeople seem to forget that it is NOT in BitFury's best interest to perform a 51% attack because, bitcoin's value will plummet if they do that.
- Retric 11y agoAs the mining rewards keep lowering it's getting to the point here someone is going to do this for the lulz. As to cost you can sell all your coins before doing a 51% attack. Short the market and at some point it might even be proffitable to do so.
- mootothemax 11y ago>People seem to forget that it is NOT in BitFury's best interest to perform a 51% attack because, bitcoin's value will plummet if they do that. If BitFury can turn $200 million into $400 million now rather than over a couple of years, why on earth would they care about the side-effect of killing off bitcoin? For the avoidance of doubt, I think that BitFury's best interest is BitFury; as long as they make a decent chunk of money, the end result for bitcoin is - and should be - immaterial to them.
- cma 11y agoBut if that was a predictable consequence, they can't turn $200million into $400million now, because other would anticipate the future state of things and the price would plummet before a couple years. Not that I think that is at all what is going to happen.
- mootothemax 11y ago>because other would anticipate the future state of things and the price would plummet before a couple years. Why would the price plummeting matter to them if they've already made their money?
- x3c 11y agoThe only way they make money (cash out) is if trust remains in the bitcoin platform. By doing 51%, they tank the platform itself. No liquidity. Provable and transparent majority attack is MAD in the strictest sense.
- creshal 11y agoIt's not pocket change… except for government organizations.
- davidgerard 11y agoIt is profoundly unlikely a state-level actor would bother. You can cripple Bitcoin transaction clearing with a thousand dollars to DDOS the network with spam. If only state-level actors had a thousand bucks lying around ...