6 ms·
How, exactly, did German authorities come to decide that California has jurisdiction in Germany? Was this pursuant to MLAT?
by vox_mollis 11y ago
How, exactly, did German authorities come to decide that California has jurisdiction in Germany? Was this pursuant to MLAT?
- nickodell 11y agoPresumably, threatening to kill people is a crime in Germany, so the German police had the authority to open an independent investigation.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]
- s73v3r 11y agoAre you saying that one should be allowed to threaten to kill people in one country from another, and not be held accountable?
- detaro 11y agoAre you saying that asking how something works is the same as saying the same thing happening is horribly wrong?
- PhasmaFelis 11y agoDon't pretend you don't know that "How, exactly did X happen" doesn't indicate that you disapprove of X.
- jacquesm 11y agoNo, he definitely was not saying that.
- cpncrunch 11y agoThat seemed to be the implication.
- wrong_internet 11y agoOP specifically asked if it was pursuant to an MLAT obligation. That alone makes it clear they were asking in earnest.
- cpncrunch 11y agoAnd yet OP also asked how California had jurisdiction in Germany, which implies that the question was more of a passive-aggressive disapproval. Even if it was MLAT, California still wouldn't have jurisdiction in Germany. OP seems to be implying "fuck off California, you have no jurisdiction in Germany". The whole thing seems to be more about shared moral responsibility rather than MLAT, which is what s73v3r was getting it.
- s73v3r 11y agoReally? Cause that sounds exactly like what he was saying.