4 ms·
Wrong. You can build an entire Haskell implementation as a thin, transparent layer on top of Lisp and then do anything Haskell can do.
by sklogic 11y ago
Wrong. You can build an entire Haskell implementation as a thin, transparent layer on top of Lisp and then do anything Haskell can do.
- reikonomusha 11y agoMy post literally says "you can build a Haskell interpreter which interacts with Lisp".
- sklogic 11y agoAnd this is irrelevant. Interpreters suck and are not interesting at all. I am talking exactly about transforming Lisp into Haskell. Fully or gradually, it does not matter.