3 ms·

Safeguards are known: - Instrument rated pilots - special, expensive, instruments (radars, etc...) - extra pair of skilled eyes (2 pilots) - n + 1 e

Safeguards are known: - Instrument rated pilots - special, expensive, instruments (radars, etc...) - extra pair of skilled eyes (2 pilots) - n + 1 engines / APU - bigger planes that have less restrictions (more power which means you can bring more weight (more luggage), take off safely from higher altitude, manoeuvre in higher cross winds etc....) Those companies that fly those airplanes with those pilots already exists, there are known as air taxi and small air charters.

acslater00 11y ago
FWIW none of these things are actual commercial flight regulations. In particular, it's quite possible (though I'm guessing uncommon) to get a commercial license without an IFR, and it's definitely very common to run single-engine, single-pilot operations with plain vanilla instruments (avionics). I'm not familiar with air transport regulations, however, and some of these things may apply there.
- pc86 11y ago
  You are correct. 14 CFR 61.133 (b)(1) states:[0] A person who applies for a commercial pilot certificate with an airplane category or powered-lift category rating and does not hold an instrument rating in the same category and class will be issued a commercial pilot certificate that contains the limitation, “The carriage of passengers for hire in (airplanes) (powered-lifts) on cross-country flights in excess of 50 nautical miles or at night is prohibited.” So you can technically get a commercial license without an instrument rating, but you won't be able to get a job until you do. My guess is it happens only in that someone is taking the courses for both and just happens to finish the commercial part first. In practice though I've never heard anyone who did that. [0] https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/61.133 https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/61.133
  - VLM 11y ago
    Crop dusters, and the guys who inspect power lines / pipelines. Also those guys who tow banners over the sportsball stadiums. None of them have much to do when its dark or cloudy.
- dorfsmay 11y ago
  I was replying to: > I would seek companies that provide internal safeguards
asift 11y ago
Those aren't the types of safeguards I was referring to...but you know what also already exists? Pilots flying the exact same flights the FAA has decided must be banned (solely because of the commercial element). My comment was narrowly referring to OP's lack of imagination in envisioning solutions to the "bad weather" criticism raised.

acslater00 11y ago

FWIW none of these things are actual commercial flight regulations. In particular, it's quite possible (though I'm guessing uncommon) to get a commercial license without an IFR, and it's definitely very common to run single-engine, single-pilot operations with plain vanilla instruments (avionics). I'm not familiar with air transport regulations, however, and some of these things may apply there.

pc86 11y ago
You are correct. 14 CFR 61.133 (b)(1) states:[0] A person who applies for a commercial pilot certificate with an airplane category or powered-lift category rating and does not hold an instrument rating in the same category and class will be issued a commercial pilot certificate that contains the limitation, “The carriage of passengers for hire in (airplanes) (powered-lifts) on cross-country flights in excess of 50 nautical miles or at night is prohibited.” So you can technically get a commercial license without an instrument rating, but you won't be able to get a job until you do. My guess is it happens only in that someone is taking the courses for both and just happens to finish the commercial part first. In practice though I've never heard anyone who did that. [0] https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/61.133 https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/14/61.133
- VLM 11y ago
  Crop dusters, and the guys who inspect power lines / pipelines. Also those guys who tow banners over the sportsball stadiums. None of them have much to do when its dark or cloudy.
dorfsmay 11y ago
I was replying to: > I would seek companies that provide internal safeguards

asift 11y ago

Those aren't the types of safeguards I was referring to...but you know what also already exists? Pilots flying the exact same flights the FAA has decided must be banned (solely because of the commercial element). My comment was narrowly referring to OP's lack of imagination in envisioning solutions to the "bad weather" criticism raised.