4 ms·
Not necessarily to the former. Definitely to the latter. To elaborate point 1: - If the crucial parts of the devices that "were modified to improve accuracy"
by seehafer 11y ago
Not necessarily to the former. Definitely to the latter.
To elaborate point 1:
- If the crucial parts of the devices that "were modified to improve accuracy" were modified early on in the study the data could be representative of the final product.
- The same applies for the devices not being fully assembled. If they weren't fully assembled, and the data were still good enough to defend a 510k, then the data should represent worst case usage, unless full assembly would somehow make the technology less performant.
- danieltillett 11y agoYes it is always possible their one test works, but reading between the lines it appears that Edison is flaky and hard to get to work consistently. Things like changing the pipet tips halfway through are amateur hour - issues like this should have been picked up in R not D.