5 ms·
Fundamentally their films are there to make money in a global economy and to ensure the artists stay hired there. And their art is shit, repetitive, and horrifi
by olewhalehunter 11y ago
Fundamentally their films are there to make money in a global economy and to ensure the artists stay hired there. And their art is shit, repetitive, and horrifically ethnocentric, they draw all their eyes the same, big, colorful, inviting, with nice clear whites; their bodies are soft, squeezable, like big babies, with fuzzy or gleaming hair, to exploit humanistic reactions.
- JabavuAdams 11y agoIs there anything you're trying to accomplish? I love myself a good rant, and most of us love to be righteous ... but ... What's the state of the world that you want? Does being this angry help you get it there?
- olewhalehunter 11y agoI'm automating distributed dialectics software and it appears to be working.
- PhasmaFelis 11y ago> they draw all their eyes the same, big, colorful, inviting, with nice clear whites; their bodies are soft, squeezable, like big babies, with fuzzy or gleaming hair, to exploit humanistic reactions. Do you also hate the Muppets? Or are you just trolling now?
- olewhalehunter 11y agoYes, children have better things to do than watching television shows owned by Disney and OP's article details why.
- PhasmaFelis 11y agoWhy are you still limiting yourself to Disney? Your complaints apply to basically 100% of all cartoons, and quite a lot of live-action children's programming, e.g. Sesame Street.
- olewhalehunter 11y agoSee my response to soylentcola