3 ms·
They weren't "clear" on this. They said were all about their proprietary technology and getting everything from a pinprick when it turns out they weren't doing
by rabidonrails 11y ago
They weren't "clear" on this. They said were all about their proprietary technology and getting everything from a pinprick when it turns out they weren't doing any of that.
It's like saying I have a great story to tell you but then reading you Moby Dick.
- padiyar83 11y agoThey never once said they were not using existing machines to do these tests, not once, they only spoke about the quantity of the sample needed. Using the same analogy, saying I have a great story to tell you but then reading Moby Dick isn't necessarily cheating, because Moby Dick is a great story :).
- rabidonrails 11y agoRight, it's not cheating or lying, just kinda misleading.
- padiyar83 11y agoAgreed, they should have been upfront on what technology they developed in house and what it can and cannot do. A simple table outlining that could have cleared up the air.
- 21echoes 11y ago> when it turns out they weren't doing any of that Except for the part where they had all 200 tests going through lab review... Is the doubt that they'll move on to getting more tests FDA approved once the first one passes full review?