No, this is an oddly wrong interpretation of Popper. Popper would never have suggested something as dumb as "if it is falsifiable, it is science." It is a dema

No, this is an oddly wrong interpretation of Popper. Popper would never have suggested something as dumb as "if it is falsifiable, it is science." It is a demarcation criterion. Falsifiability is definitely a very good attribute but it is necessary, not sufficient.