4 ms·
I don't know about gruseom's nephew, but I suspect that even or especially for people just reaching the age where they can begin programming, there is something
by rms 17y ago
I don't know about gruseom's nephew, but I suspect that even or especially for people just reaching the age where they can begin programming, there is something inherently more difficult about understanding lisp-like structure compared to more python or ruby like structure. Perhaps I am underestimating the minds of today's 11 year olds, but I don't think I would have gotten lisp at that age.
If anyone has actually tried to teach a 10 or 11 or 12 year old lisp, the whole board would be curious about your results. For now, I think it makes more sense for gruseom's nephew to use one of the languages with pedagogy better tested on young people: python or ruby.
Gruseom, the choice between python or ruby doesn't make that much difference, go with whichever one you are more comfortable with. One nice thing about ruby is Hackety Hack; a self-contained learning IDE. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hackety_Hack http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hackety_Hack
- Zak 17y agoI honestly believe the structure of Lisp is easier to pick up than other languages. You always know where a construct begins and ends in a Lisp.