i've been thinking a lot about your inquiry and my response, so i thank you for taking the time to make it you've caused me to really consider what my goals ar

i've been thinking a lot about your inquiry and my response, so i thank you for taking the time to make it you've caused me to really consider what my goals are i am uninterested in making plastics illegal but rather i'm interested in reducing the amount of plastic waste in the world my initial reaction is the best way to halt this is to remove the ability to create more plastics but as you pointed out it's more interesting to promote stead limit so perhaps instead of making plastic use for superficial, yet to be clearly defined, uses illegal perhaps there is a buy in for use allowance meaning plastic bottling is illegal unless you pay for the rights for so much plastic use but the caveat is two fold first: in order to pay for the rights you need to agree to reduce overall plastic waste in the world meaning, you can use plastic bottles for your product, but you need to be diminishing old plastic accumulation if you fail to reduce at the rate agreed in the permission then your rights are again revoked second: the only ones who can buy the rights to create plastics are research teams attempting to decompose existing plastics in this way the research is funded by the sponsorship of plastic users meaning, a big corp that bottles in plastic uses profits to fund research in plastic decomposition for the ability to continue to bottle in plastics . any thoughts?