3 ms·
To what end? The only audience - other than engineers - such a network would appeal to is recruiters looking for engineers, which at least in the long-term woul
by BjoernKW 11y ago
To what end? The only audience - other than engineers - such a network would appeal to is recruiters looking for engineers, which at least in the long-term would cause pretty much the same problems you described. What's the purpose of engineers only networking among each other? Engineering is not a bubble that lives independently of other professions.
Another point is: Would you pay for such a service? The main reason why LinkedIn is as it is, is that nobody (well, nobody save for recruiters) wants to pay for their service. Hence, they had to find other avenues of monetization and started selling their users' profile data. XING - a European competitor - isn't entirely free but had a fairly successful premium offering right from the start. From what I'm seeing they don't have a prevalent spam problem, at least not to the extent LinkedIn has (LinkedIn spam probably isn't even seen as a problem by the company at all but rather encouraged, they just don't say so openly).
- rileyt 11y agoIt doesn't have to be for just engineers. It just seems like most competitors to large services like linkedin start by targeting a specific group. The purpose of engineers networking amongst each other would be for referrals, which are arguably more important than recruiters reaching out to random people. I would consider paying for the service, but not much (and im not sure many other people would). You definitely have a good point here. I'm not sure how you could make money without having the recruiters as your customers, which would put you back in the same bad place as linkedin. Maybe something along the lines of tying it to the refarral bonuses people are getting?