3 ms·
Doesn't necessarily require a 'rootkit'. Maybe it's a smaller bit of subtle corruption of a random-number generator. Maybe even it's an unintentional flaw that
by gojomo 11y ago
Doesn't necessarily require a 'rootkit'. Maybe it's a smaller bit of subtle corruption of a random-number generator. Maybe even it's an unintentional flaw that he learned about during an audit and then decided to exploit rather than fix.
- Cyberdog 11y agoThe prosecution is saying it's a rootkit. So either they found a rootkit, or the prosecution just though tit was a sufficiently tech-ish enough word to build a case around while hoping nobody would call them on the lack of evidence for one (the latter would not surprise me).