> Even a CEO is commonly able to be monitored by HR. What do you consider "being monitored" in this context? The CEO answers to the board. Would I be naive in

> Even a CEO is commonly able to be monitored by HR. What do you consider "being monitored" in this context? The CEO answers to the board. Would I be naive in assuming the CEO is so far above HR and IT that monitoring him wouldn't be within their jurisdiction without the board requesting something specifically behind the CEO's back?