3 ms·
It would be interesting to show what percentage of a person's total rep is derived from their repeated postings from one site. Also, I think you should show th
by johns 17y ago
It would be interesting to show what percentage of a person's total rep is derived from their repeated postings from one site.
Also, I think you should show the names. I'm sure I'm in the list, and I want to know where :) Especially since I don't really post links like I used to (and I've always tried to only post quality links, no matter the source).
- jacquesm 17y agoFor the top poster that's roughly 30%. And no, you're not in the top 100 in this case. You're actually much more selective, you've only posted 4 techcrunch links that I'm aware of and scored 24.75 points on average with those. That's about 3 times as good as the 'top' tc submitter so you are three times better at spotting what to submit and what not. Showing that is exactly the point of this whole exercise. If you blindly submit every tc article you'll score lots of points, but if you are selective you get less points but average much better. The 'bad' behaviour is rewarded though, the absolute number of points is not to be compared, 6000+ for the top submitter and only 100 for you.
- johns 17y agoI used to blind submit a lot of Joel on Software, Coding Horror (I feel slightly responsible for a lot of his posts on the site since there weren't many before I started posting them. I've stopped and I'm sorry.) and 37signals. So I was sort of expecting to be in the list for those. I must not have had the volume. I would love to see my complete stats, but I'm just a stats junkie (hence my love for rep-based communities and sports).