> So from the point of view of art-as-marketing, you couldn't do that. And now you've circled back around to what I think I'm poorly stating as a central point

> So from the point of view of art-as-marketing, you couldn't do that. And now you've circled back around to what I think I'm poorly stating as a central point. Modern art exists only as a way to sink wealth into physical goods. It doesn't have to be good, it doesn't have to mean anything, it just has to be expensive and likely to grow in value.