3 ms·
Search without a warrant though sounds unconstitutional. Legislative arbitrage. Passed low key in Congress, Removed at high cost in the courts
by pinkrooftop 11y ago
Search without a warrant though sounds unconstitutional. Legislative arbitrage. Passed low key in Congress, Removed at high cost in the courts
- egwynn 11y agoI believe CISA is more about what the feds MUST do and what private companies MAY do. It’s incentivising the private companies to rat you out, not requiring that they do so.
- knughit 11y agoAnd Room 419A shows us how that plays out in practice. Private companies get paid to break the law wih immunity.
- rhino369 11y agoFacebook or Google searching their own data isn't a search under the 4th amendment. All that data analysis they run on you is their data not yours. Them searching your private messages/emails are (probably) a search but since they aren't government the 4th amendment doesn't apply. If government specifically coordinates that brings it under the 4th amendment. But--here is the problem. Google (and I assume facebook) are already reading your email. They run algorithms and text searches on it. If I were DOJ I'd argue 1) that none of those messages are private since the companies are allowed to read the data whenever they want. 2) if not, then the indexing and analysis is definitely not private. People should step back and realize this CISA only occurs when you already let companies violate your privacy.