The article is a fascinating read. Reminded me of a discussion in a class a long time ago about art and what it means; I settled on defining "art" as any artifa

The article is a fascinating read. Reminded me of a discussion in a class a long time ago about art and what it means; I settled on defining "art" as any artifact labeled as "art" and that someone is willing to pay for, excluding the artist's mother. An operational, if cynical, definition. But it will have to do until we go back to not being afraid to judge, to offend, to debate views that are not "politically correct" (the recent Rhodes statue "controversy" being a ridiculous case in point)