2 ms·
I agree on types and functional implementation being sucky, but simpler datatype are definitely in, just need some imagination a struct, by any other name: pu
by LoSboccacc 11y ago
I agree on types and functional implementation being sucky, but simpler datatype are definitely in, just need some imagination
a struct, by any other name:
public class Point {
public int x,y;
}
you can even do binary packed stuff with some fantasy
public class PackedRGBA{
private long v;
//following getters and setter bit shifting
}