3 ms·
> has become almost completely not usable for businesses just trying to business Maybe they should have invested in proper end-to-end crypto and actually care
by pdkl95 11y ago
> has become almost completely not usable for businesses just trying to business
Maybe they should have invested in proper end-to-end crypto and actually care about security. If you business depends entirely on a resource, it's usually a good idea to protect that resource.
> Google's default web page
Why would google do that? You're asking them to completely undermine their business model. Google/Facebook/etc are just as bad as governments in their desire to vacuum up as much personal data as possible. Usually, there isn't much of a difference between government and business - national security letters, PRISM, and FAIRVIEW (AT&T) mean that whatever these private business have is also available to government (or anybody else that can gain access to the data).
Both sides like the arrangement, so why would they put up warnings? That would only reduce the amount of data they get to play with.
- blazespin 11y agoThere should be a law that warnings should be present.
- pdkl95 11y agoWhy would the government pass such a law that reduces their surveillance capability? The question is how to fix institutional corruption block the public-private partnerships. When that is accomplished will we have the luxury of worrying about legislating warni8ngs.