I'm not sure I get it. Is the point that Jobs is a better leader than Obama? Or more charismatic? Or that if Obama accomplished as much as Jobs, people would li

I'm not sure I get it. Is the point that Jobs is a better leader than Obama? Or more charismatic? Or that if Obama accomplished as much as Jobs, people would like him more? I can understand responding emotionally to this article. But it isn't funny, because there isn't a detectable premise.