On the contrary, Greenfield's proposal directly and explicitly addresses "the problem, the uniqueness and the mystery of consciousness" and proposes a simple so

On the contrary, Greenfield's proposal directly and explicitly addresses "the problem, the uniqueness and the mystery of consciousness" and proposes a simple solution which explains them. Just because you think she's wrong doesn't mean you can dismiss the argument as missing the point. She knows the area very well. I don't attempt to present her argument, just the proposal. The book is interesting.