4 ms·
That would make firefox inconsistent for different users that don't have the codec installed and it would make it look bad. Imagine passing a link to a friend t
by freetard 17y ago
That would make firefox inconsistent for different users that don't have the codec installed and it would make it look bad. Imagine passing a link to a friend that is not able to read it because of lack of codec, he'd blame it on firefox. So, that's not moral either.
- jonknee 17y agoIt would be no different than the situation with Flash. Not supporting it at all makes the situation worse--you pass the link to a friend and there's no way to view it. Because of IE there will be rollback support to Flash for the foreseeable future, so the likely result is that FireFox users will miss out on the benefits of the <video> tag. Stupid.
- freetard 17y agoIt's not the same because Flash is available for free and on all platforms. Not the case with h.264.