3 ms·
I think 2.0 implies breaking backwards compatibility, which the Go devs have opposed on principle.
by omginternets 11y ago
I think 2.0 implies breaking backwards compatibility, which the Go devs have opposed on principle.
- sudhirj 11y agoI seriously doubt that - what they have clearly opposed is breaking backwards compatibility in Go 1.x - they day they decide to break backwards compatibility is the day work begins on Go 2.0
- omginternets 11y agoThat's... what I just said...