3 ms·
If FB wanted to show the researcher that they were really, ALL-CAPS serious, then they would talk to him directly as in "You've got stolen data and we're going
by slantyyz 11y ago
If FB wanted to show the researcher that they were really, ALL-CAPS serious, then they would talk to him directly as in "You've got stolen data and we're going have the FBI arrest you, seize your computers and put you in jail ruin-your-livelihood if you don't stop" serious.
So I still don't see how calling the guy's boss trumps that in terms of scariness. Because if I'm the wronged party (i.e., FB), that's what I'd do if I couldn't resolve it amicably.
- sangnoir 11y agoIf we are disagreeing, I don't quite follow your argument - I never said that this was the worst/scariest thing Facebook could to do (there's no upper limit). What I meant was that the action by Facebook was intended to intimidate (and not that the specific form of intimidation was the worst possible)
- slantyyz 11y agoWe're not disagreeing. I think your interpretation of tptacek's subtext is the same as mine. In some of his posts, he has been, however, comparing the researcher's dump to criminal activity -- something I am not in disagreement with. His implication that calling the researcher's boss is a sensible approach to intimidating the researcher for potentially criminal activity -- that in particular seems like a stretch if he's being truly objective.