3 ms·
If we are paying for access to the infrastructure, then why are students boxed into many separate cells staffed by a human "teacher". If you admit the teacher u
by relkor 11y ago
If we are paying for access to the infrastructure, then why are students boxed into many separate cells staffed by a human "teacher". If you admit the teacher unit is worthless, then why are they there? According to your business plan the tuition does not go to pay the teachers, so then where did these teachers (who have no role what so ever in your view of education) get funding. I want to know. If we were just paying for access to infrastructure, then why are we not packed into large warehouses filled with desks and library books, overseen by a single armed guard on an overhead walkway? That would more efficient, and we all know us evil capitalists love efficiency.
Just because you pay money for something does not mean you can invoke the specter of consumerism and then proceed to shame it. You need water, no doubt about it. Is it evil when you pay for clean water?
- sklogic 11y agoTeachers time is a part of this infrastructure. They're paying for it, they're getting their share. How to use that time is 100% their responsibility.