5 ms·
I'm continually astonished at how much sway Universal Grammar still holds. This entire field has completely ignored the fact that AI and machine learning exist.
by shmageggy 11y ago
I'm continually astonished at how much sway Universal Grammar still holds. This entire field has completely ignored the fact that AI and machine learning exist. Chomsky was and is a genius, but Max Planck was right when he said science advances one funeral at a time.
- XaspR8d 11y agoI definitely agree that universal grammar has been dying a long slow death, but despite press coverage, I suspect universalists are the minority nowadays. Either way I hardly think linguistics has ignored AI/machine learning. In general there's an anticipation of eventual synergy between the domains, but ML has yet to magically solve the "poverty of stimulus" issues with pattern recognition that originally prompted hypotheses like UG...
- shmageggy 11y agoAh sorry, by "entire field" I meant the subset of linguists who are doing this kind of research. And I agree that AI/ML hasn't solved every problem raised by the poverty of the stimulus, but more importantly I think it is clear at this point that we should be framing these phenomena in terms of learning and inductive biases rather than solely in terms of UG.
- panglott 11y agoThe "poverty of the stimulus" is no more than a dubious hypothesis.
- panglott 11y agoChomsky's main influence came not so much from any particular theory as from the fact that he offered a coherent research program to a generation of linguistics grad students. The resulting hangover is long and painful.
- aecay 11y agoUniversal grammar is a theory about how the human mind processes language. AI and ML don't bear on it at all.