3 ms·

Then rotating their SSL keys shouldn't be relevant.

• tck42 11y ago
  Unless I'm misunderstanding, it's relevant because this researcher was able to access (from the blog): -- SSL certificates and private keys, including both instagram.com and *.instagram.com If this researcher was able to access it via not much more than a hole that was _already reported multiple times_, then I think it's not a stretch to think that [many?] other less honest parties could (and in my opinion most likely do) already have it. If it was me, even if it's definitely only a single researcher who got access (and it doesn't sound to me like they know for sure - but regardless), something _that_ sensitive would have to be rotated anyways. If it was someone outside the teams that strictly require access to it operationaly, I'd rotate it, let alone outside the company.