3 ms·

Why should the license be free? Pharmacies need licensed operators right? Why should this medicine be any different?

• wolfgke 11y ago
  Why should the license for pharmacies not be free?
  • wmoxam 11y ago
    To recover costs of licensing
    • JulianMorrison 11y ago
      Costs of licensing would be extremely negligible if a license is basically a name and address combined with proof of ID.
      • MichaelGG 11y ago
        Then getting banned is no big deal. Have your friends, family, CL buddies, etc. setup in the same place. I'm all for total legalization of essentially every medicine. Just with strong regulation, because pharma dealers haven't shown a whole lot of internal integrity on their own. (And perhaps strong waivers, waiting periods, or mandatory understanding tests for buyers of certain meds, like pentobarbital.) Pot's just a plant, but so are poppies. Extracts, harmful growing practices, combinations (think of all the "MDMA" laced with shit) and whatever else should be monitored, controlled, and vendors should have significant time/money at risk. Someone taking a large multiple of the dose they thought they were getting can be pretty harmful, even if it doesn't physically damage them.
  • MichaelGG 11y ago
    Where is the money coming to audit these places? Who writes up the fines/bans and enforces them? Also if the licensing is so easy, bad vendors can simply use other identities. Making licensing tough and expensive means bad actors pay harder.
    • robotresearcher 11y ago
      > Where is the money coming to audit these places? They will generate a whole lot of tax revenue.