3 ms·
You're really speaking for a minority there. Most people browse with javascript enabled and I don't think developers should even cater for non-javascript users
by eecks 11y ago
You're really speaking for a minority there. Most people browse with javascript enabled and I don't think developers should even cater for non-javascript users anymore.
- zeveb 11y ago> I don't think developers should even cater for non-javascript users anymore. What do you mean by 'cater to'? If you mean 'develop primarily for,' sure. If you mean 'tolerate,' then you're part of what's wrong with today's Internet.
- stefantalpalaru 11y agoWe already have to deal with multiple versions of multiple browsers on desktops, phones and tablets, on screens with a wide PPI range. There's no way to justify more work by saying that some people want to browse the web without javascript, or with text browsers.
- eecks 11y agoWell you're being left behind.. so bye.