4 ms·
But is it guaranteed to be buggy and insecure just because it is by Adobe?
by JustSomeNobody 11y ago
But is it guaranteed to be buggy and insecure just because it is by Adobe?
- daguava 11y agoI desperately hope not, my original comment sure appears to come off as rooting against Adobe, but I'll absolutely hope this means success and is the start of secured content playback on HTML5
- pasbesoin 11y agoHaving spent 7.5 hours on multiple customer support calls to Adobe just to get a feature enabled (compatibility with a 32 bit system) that was stated ON THE PRODUCT BOX as being present and working... YES! (Yes, this is a bit OT, but still, "Adobe".) I also fear the CDM support being used to "lock down" ever more aspects of web content. And I fear attempts on the part of Adobe as well as others (perhaps in concert with a State or corporate power) to escape sandboxing and do "whatever" on client systems for their own purposes. In other words, here is another binary blob from Adobe (et al.?) that we are supposed to trust. Sorry, Adobe, but -- through dint of extended experience -- I simply don't trust you.