>assume that I simply do not understand the issue as well as you do Not, I assumed you had different understanding. Maybe you do have a more accurate understa

>assume that I simply do not understand the issue as well as you do Not, I assumed you had different understanding. Maybe you do have a more accurate understanding of the situation but that isn't clear yet. And as for giving a simple explanation? Why is that a bad thing? I want to communicate clearly so you can understand me. >That's why I can't stand LWers. I'm not a LWer. I don't have an account there. I've never interacted with the community at all. I've just read some of the posts. >Here's an excerpt on him talking about the basilisk. Which just supports my understanding. As he says: >Basically, the same obvious precautions you'd use if Lovecraft's Necronomicon was online and could be found using simple Google keywords - you wouldn't post anything which would cause anyone to enter those Google keywords, unless they'd been warned about the potential consequences. Which is analogy akin to my coding one. >But since you are so DESPERATE to defend Elizer I think Elizier is a pretty messed up person. He clearly has mental issues. At the same time, I am very thankful to him/LW/HPMOR for personal reasons. Which is why I will step up to defend him when I think he/LW is being, I guess slandered? > (when I have not once said that I dislike him - something else that you would have noticed if you bothered to LISTEN) I never accused you of disliking him. Honestly though, for as much as you've condemned my behavior in this discussion, I'm not the one repeatedly insulting people.