3 ms·
Author here. Thanks for the discussion. UML didn't pick up for whatever reason and visual programming fell into the valley of deception. I expect that with mor
by luisobo 11y ago
Author here. Thanks for the discussion.
UML didn't pick up for whatever reason and visual programming fell into the valley of deception. I expect that with more UI/UX research we can get to the plateau of productivity in the next decade.
Btw, there is a variant of UML that is executable. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executable_UML https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executable_UML
- acqq 11y ago> there is a variant of UML that is executable. If you believe it's a good way, you should certainly go that way. Please write about your experiences afterwards. Rose 2.0, I've mentioned and quoted explicitly, produced the code from the diagrams (that's the "code generation" from the quote). And it was tragedy. Maybe you find somebody's experiences on the web.
- arethuza 11y ago"And it was tragedy." That sounds quite positive compared to my experiences with code generated from UML.
- dikeert 11y agoWrong. Here is a thing, soviet spaceship Buran, which was performing fully automated landing in 1991, was programmed with this stuff - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRAKON https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DRAKON. Teams of software engineers created this language so rocker scientists would be able to programm spaceship without software developers.