3 ms·
Some contradictions I found: > Of course we have never questioned any of this. We don’t have a direction, a path or an overall goal for programming! > Let me
by kh_hk 11y ago
Some contradictions I found:
> Of course we have never questioned any of this. We don’t have a direction, a path or an overall goal for programming!
> Let me ask you this: What would programming be to you in an ideal world?
> We don’t know! We’ve never asked ourselves this question!
When at the start of the "essay":
> Turns out, we are horrible at predicting the future and we end up discarding that extra complexity.
Too bad outsiders think (and will for a long time) it's a done thing. Society thinks software is the best thing since sliced bread so it's all around us. It's both a curse and a blessing.
Compared to other fields, CS or engineering is relatively new. It's exciting, it will keep breaking and evolving. And that should be it. It should keep going places without restrictions, precisely because we don't know.
Similarly to scientists ripping open humans on anathomical theatres in the 17th, we are having fun.
- luisobo 11y agoauthor here. Thanks for your point. You hit the spot. Yes, who is it to say that we reinvent programming tomorrow and it useless by next week. Great point. My answer is, don't look at it from a black and white perspective. I'm not aiming for a 100% future proof solution, that is impossible as you pointed out. But we can make something much more future proof that what we have right now.