4 ms·
That article raises an interesting question that I've seen before. Namely: in the event where loss of life is inevitable, who does the car choose to save, and
by hellcow 11y ago
That article raises an interesting question that I've seen before. Namely: in the event where loss of life is inevitable, who does the car choose to save, and who does it choose to kill? Pedestrians or occupants?
I expect auto insurance companies will have the final decision on this one. They'll provide lower insurance rates for cars that make the correct decisions minimizing total insurance payouts (whatever those happen to be). With lower insurance costs and therefore a lower effective price, sales of that particular brand of self-driving software should increase. Competitors will then rush to do the same.
- peteretep 11y agoPresumably it's better to kill whomever is at fault, which the car will assume is not it?
- notatoad 11y agoIn the driving class I took when I was 16, we were taught to always prefer crashing into another car instead of a pedestrian if there was no alternative - humans don't have crumple zones designed into them, cars do. I would assume self-driving cars would be programmed similarly.
- deleted 11y ago[deleted]