That makes sense. Although when looked through policy-making perspective this change is further stabilizing the already dystopian trajectory of international t

That makes sense. Although when looked through policy-making perspective this change is further stabilizing the already dystopian trajectory of international tech laws. The worst of the worst just keeps getting compiled and eventually voted through. And under the guise of "war on terrorism", "war on pedophiles", "war on hackers" etc. I just don't see this ending anything but horribly. Either with a monopoly driven "light-net" full of censorship, and no way of entry for the "smaller" businesses, ngo's, dissident groups etc. Or worse with a global pre-crime dictatorship.