2 ms·
My thoughts: Bandwidth. For it to make sense, he'd have to do hosting too, and charge for it. (Otherwise it'd be inefficient and costly.) I'd be ok with havin
by striking 11y ago
My thoughts: Bandwidth.
For it to make sense, he'd have to do hosting too, and charge for it. (Otherwise it'd be inefficient and costly.)
I'd be ok with having a web-based frontend to this that I could run on my own server, though. That or make a better (and libre!) Google Photos.
- jmathai 11y agoMy original goal was for this to become a static API generator from which a static website could be created. Once I started down this path though that destination became less attractive. I love the idea of a libre Google Photos but once I integrated Elodie with Google Photos [1] I lost the motivation to have another front end for my photos :). [1] https://medium.com/p/my-automated-photo-workflow-using-google-photos-and-elodie-afb753b8c724 https://medium.com/p/my-automated-photo-workflow-using-googl...