4 ms·
I don't follow why AI vehicles need to be 100% good. Plain old human-driven vehicles sure aren't and we accept their utility as being worth the trade.
by oldmanjay 11y ago
I don't follow why AI vehicles need to be 100% good. Plain old human-driven vehicles sure aren't and we accept their utility as being worth the trade.
- rolux 11y agoIn one word: liability.
- elliottpayne 11y agoIn two words: actuarial tables
- unclebucknasty 11y agoImagine the day an AI vehicle causes an accident that otherwise would not have happened. Even if AI cars are statistically better than humans on average, it's an issue of control. It's true that most accidents are avoidable and caused by human error, but most people are (perhaps overly) confident in their own ability to drive safely (this is also why people text and drive).
- dclowd9901 11y agoWe, as the flawed beings we are, can't accept both giving up control and not getting guaranteed safety as a result.