3 ms·
Definitely cheap! I'm guessing it shouldn't be used for serving content without a CDN in front of it, though, as you just get a connection without great focus
by pierrec 11y ago
Definitely cheap!
I'm guessing it shouldn't be used for serving content without a CDN in front of it, though, as you just get a connection without great focus on download speeds or distribution. This makes their use case example "Cloud Applications" slightly misleading (or at least, incomplete), and also their comparisons... I'm not sure which plans they're using in that table, but I think some of these have a rather good CDN included (Rackspace for for example).
Still a great option for backup, blows Glacier out of the water. And certainly usable without a CDN for the "storage" portion of an application that doesn't require top speeds.