4 ms·

If everyone in government is a Democrat, why do you need elections?

• Zikes 11y ago
  If everyone has been so far as to do look like, why do you even?
  • isolate 11y ago
    I guess English is not your first language? I can't understand anything past "been", which is surprising given how easily I understood your last question.
    • tricolon 11y ago
      That was a reference to a meme: http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/has-anyone-really-been-far-even-as-decided-to-use-even-go-want-to-do-look-more-like http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/has-anyone-really-been-far-eve...
      • isolate 11y ago
        Yeah, sorry, I graduated junior high a while ago. The guy probably assumed I was disagreeing with him, which is fair, I suppose. (But anyway thanks for educating me.)
    • striking 11y ago
      "has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like" http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/has-anyone-really-been-far-even-as-decided-to-use-even-go-want-to-do-look-more-like http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/has-anyone-really-been-far-eve...
• fweespeech 11y ago
  Do you really want me to start going through the list of Democrat cunts I want out of office such as Dianne Feinstein despite the fact I usually vote for Democrats? Just because people are in a given group doesn't mean you want them around with the ability to exercise power.
  • aaronem 11y ago
    "Cunts"? Really? And you expect to be taken seriously by grownups? I mean, I was going to ask you why it's not okay to invalidate the experiences of women talking about sexism in tech, but totally okay to invalidate the experiences of people with unpopular beliefs talking about how they've been mistreated on that basis. I don't think I'm going to bother, because I don't see that argument getting anywhere with you -- but, you know, that's really not because it's the argument that's flawed.
    • fweespeech 11y ago
      > "Cunts"? Really? And you expect to be taken seriously by grownups? I bear a very strong hatred to a handful of specific politicians for very specific reasons I can cite. Would you like a list of people and reasons I'd call them cunt/asshole? Similarly, the fact you took the bait convinces me you honestly are unable to provide evidence of your conclusions on any reasonable scale and are simply unwilling to admit it. It was a test to see if you would do exactly what I expected and you did. Good job. > I mean, I was going to ask you why it's not okay to invalidate the experiences of women talking about sexism in tech, but totally okay to invalidate the experiences of people with unpopular beliefs talking about how they've been mistreated on that basis. I don't think I'm going to bother, because I don't see that argument getting anywhere with you -- but, you know, that's really not because it's the argument that's flawed. 1) You've provided no evidence that is the case and I'm taking this an admission you are unable to do so. 2) There is evidence of sexism in tech. It may not be as widely and deeply researched as your previous attempt to link your failed argument to racism...but yeah. This is basic an admission you can't tell the difference between evidence of bigotry and a lack thereof.
      • isolate 11y ago
        Personal attacks are not allowed on Hacker News. Either of you.
  • deleted 11y ago
    [deleted]