Even if that's the case, I still think it's a poorly written article. Scientists have reached a very interesting finding. You can either write an article about

Even if that's the case, I still think it's a poorly written article. Scientists have reached a very interesting finding. You can either write an article about how such finding was made(actual experiments, data collected, curiosities along the work, oppositions against common sense, etc) or what such finding means (what I already made a point). If the article is about the finding (and not what it means), as I believe it's what you're saying, note that there is nothing meaningful about the research at all, just the conclusion. Great articles tackles both points. Good articles tackles one. This article tackles none.