3 ms·
> I have family that lives in Section 8 housing. They are a danger or annoyance to no one. Neither are short-term hotel guests, but tptacek wants to reduce tho
by zeveb 11y ago
> I have family that lives in Section 8 housing. They are a danger or annoyance to no one.
Neither are short-term hotel guests, but tptacek wants to reduce those while welcoming Section 8, which is logically inconsistent.
- tptacek 11y agoNo, the equivalence you've drawn between long-term renters who happen to qualify for housing vouchers and people who stay for a few nights in a house while traveling is the illogical argument.
- zeveb 11y ago> No, the equivalence you've drawn between long-term renters who happen to qualify for housing vouchers and people who stay for a few nights in a house while traveling is the illogical argument. They are both groups of people who some folks wish to exclude as neighbours, and others wish to include as neighbours, in both cases presumably based on desirability or undesirability qua neighbours. I've explained my reasoning (which is that I think short-term renters are more likely to be of a similar social class as their neighbours than are those who qualify for housing vouchers, and that I view local class homogeneity as a social good); it's hardly illogical, although you are of course free to disagree with it.