if they've got millions of papers they're working with and they have been found to have had 2 blunders, i'd say they're as close to perfect as human beings can

if they've got millions of papers they're working with and they have been found to have had 2 blunders, i'd say they're as close to perfect as human beings can get. or would you expect absolute perfection from the years and years and volume after volume of data that they have had to read through to assemble an analysis? me thinks thee protests too much. and if you think, somehow that this negates the fact that the earth is warming, show me how this incident changes all the other data that verifies it? the glaciers are melting and some at a very rapid rate. they're just not going to be gone by the absurd date of 2035.