3 ms·

You are free to question PG's motives and cry censorship, but to me, that blog post was malicious, tasteless, angry drivel that I really wouldn't want to see on

by ericb 17y ago

You are free to question PG's motives and cry censorship, but to me, that blog post was malicious, tasteless, angry drivel that I really wouldn't want to see on here, whether it was about a YC company or not.

tptacek 17y ago
That's why we have the "flag" button. It doesn't blacklist sites that are mean to YC companies.
bonsaitree 17y ago
Even a casual search of ScribD content will reveal the motives for Mr. Mann's post. He has every right to be angry. The malice has been well-earned by ScribD's repeated actions with other creator's content for nearly its entire history. While it's true there's no accounting for taste, I suggest you consult the dictionary on the definition of 'drivel'. At the end of the day, PG can do, essentially, whatever he likes with the content, routing (or lack there of), and posting permissions on Hacker News. It's HIS site. It's a shame that ScribD doesn't seem to play by an equivalent set of ownership principles. Namely, hosting and making money off other creator's content without so much as asking their permission; let alone proffering any ad-revenue sharing.
- ericb 17y ago
  >I suggest you consult the dictionary on the definition of 'drivel'. I meant drivel. The linked post starts with: > So, I went with, “fuckyourwhoremotherinheronegoodear.” Drivel is "childish talk" (mom insults, anyone?) http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/drivel http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/drivel As to your other points, I think they are good. For me, intelligent debate does not talk about fucking anyone's whore mother in their ear. If that is what I was looking for, I'd read YouTube comments. edit: admittedly, tptacek does have a point re: the flag button vs. blacklist.
  - bonsaitree 17y ago
    Kudos indeed. I'm glad Tptacek brought up the often-neglected 'flag' feature. Again, there's no accounting for taste, but offhand I'd say labeling curse words, and their creative use, as "childish" is quite overreaching. Have you read any David Mamet, Frank McCourt, or Larry McMurtry lately? Do you honestly feel a child would have sufficient skill to structure prose in that fashion?
    - ericb 17y ago
      I never said anything about cursing. I said mom insults were childish. So yeah, if I had said that, that would have been overreaching.

by ericb 17y ago

tptacek 17y ago

That's why we have the "flag" button. It doesn't blacklist sites that are mean to YC companies.

bonsaitree 17y ago

Even a casual search of ScribD content will reveal the motives for Mr. Mann's post. He has every right to be angry. The malice has been well-earned by ScribD's repeated actions with other creator's content for nearly its entire history. While it's true there's no accounting for taste, I suggest you consult the dictionary on the definition of 'drivel'. At the end of the day, PG can do, essentially, whatever he likes with the content, routing (or lack there of), and posting permissions on Hacker News. It's HIS site. It's a shame that ScribD doesn't seem to play by an equivalent set of ownership principles. Namely, hosting and making money off other creator's content without so much as asking their permission; let alone proffering any ad-revenue sharing.

ericb 17y ago
>I suggest you consult the dictionary on the definition of 'drivel'. I meant drivel. The linked post starts with: > So, I went with, “fuckyourwhoremotherinheronegoodear.” Drivel is "childish talk" (mom insults, anyone?) http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/drivel http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/drivel As to your other points, I think they are good. For me, intelligent debate does not talk about fucking anyone's whore mother in their ear. If that is what I was looking for, I'd read YouTube comments. edit: admittedly, tptacek does have a point re: the flag button vs. blacklist.
- bonsaitree 17y ago
  Kudos indeed. I'm glad Tptacek brought up the often-neglected 'flag' feature. Again, there's no accounting for taste, but offhand I'd say labeling curse words, and their creative use, as "childish" is quite overreaching. Have you read any David Mamet, Frank McCourt, or Larry McMurtry lately? Do you honestly feel a child would have sufficient skill to structure prose in that fashion?
  - ericb 17y ago
    I never said anything about cursing. I said mom insults were childish. So yeah, if I had said that, that would have been overreaching.