4 ms·
Yeah, those two. There are some Latvian ones as well. What are some of the issues you've ran into with them? Genuinely curious.
by lqdc13 11y ago
Yeah, those two. There are some Latvian ones as well. What are some of the issues you've ran into with them? Genuinely curious.
- noir_lord 11y agoI used Hetzner a few years ago, in the space of 6 weeks I had 3-4 times I couldn't login because the network was saturated under a "DDoS", I had random and sporadic network drops even when they said they weren't having problems. Latency was an absolute disaster even typing characters via SSH was horribly slow. The management platform was hilariously bad (they where still sending me notification emails about 9mths after I cancelled). We went back to linode for everything after that, for our needs it hits the sweet spot between cost and reliability (back then DO was new and had it's own issues, largely due to a flaky network). Now I'd possibly consider DO for compute or job servers but I think I'd still use Linode for anything that wasn't running on my own hardware, I've been a customer with them for something like 6 years and they've never let me down.
- lqdc13 11y agoMakes sense. I've used Hetzner for 2 years now for a lot for personal projects, and I do get slowish SSH sometimes, but that's what Mosh is for. Also, it's much better for European customers than for US ones. They are also the only service I can afford for personal projects that requires a lot of RAM. Basically, any machine learning with a ton of features. Here's a test with latency: URL tested: http://rerecommender.com Test performed from: New York, NY Test performed at: 2015-12-18 04:36:44 (GMT +00:00) Resolved As: 188.40.128.87 Status: OK Response Time: 0.306 sec DNS: 0.075 sec Connect: 0.115 sec Redirect: 0.000 sec First byte: 0.116 sec Last byte: 0.001 sec Size: 7688 bytes