Wherever and whenever the politics or faith is discussed among those not having the same views the discussion can be considered a flamewar as most of the time j

Wherever and whenever the politics or faith is discussed among those not having the same views the discussion can be considered a flamewar as most of the time just the beliefs of one of other side are rephrased. I try not making such kind of contributions by stating and quoting the established facts. I can give more sources for any statement of the post above. I don't understand why stating the facts is something negative, except that the facts aren't widely known. But that's exactly why it's worth mentioning them. If anybody questions any of the facts, the support for them can be cited etc. My "inflammatory" reply is by the way the reply to the post having, among other sentences: "The reason people revere Osama bin Laden as a hero is because he is fighting the dark power that has oppressed them - literally, with bombs and guns - for a generation." My claim is, it's not that OBL fought against "oppressors" in general, he had very specific faith-based highly intolerant ideology which is in the widest strokes described in my post. Not to mention that his definition of "oppression" was "having the military bases of infidels on our holy lands." And I'm very sure that every sentence of my post is true.