This. The court ruled against her because she demanded information she herself had previously made available to the general public to be removed based on privac

This. The court ruled against her because she demanded information she herself had previously made available to the general public to be removed based on privacy concerns. While I would maintain that "available to the general public" doesn't equal "available to everyone" (info on the web is more likely widely available than info in a print book) I agree with the court in that her claim against Wikimedia is invalid in this case.