2 ms·
I think CGP Grey is an interesting counterpoint. I think he said that his YouTube channel is something like #700 in terms of subscribers, so he's not up at the
by dangoor 11y ago
I think CGP Grey is an interesting counterpoint. I think he said that his YouTube channel is something like #700 in terms of subscribers, so he's not up at the top of the food chain.
And yet, he gets paid $13.5k per video:
http://graphtreon.com/top-patreon-creators http://graphtreon.com/top-patreon-creators
with "only" 5100 patrons. He's also on two successful podcasts that doubtless net him a few thousand more per month.
He's also gone out of his way to make sure that he's not visibly famous (he doesn't appear in his videos), which is an interesting contrast with the people in this article.
If I had to guess the biggest difference between CGP Grey and the people discussed in this article, I would guess that CGP Grey had a plan and optimized for things that can actually make a living for him. He talks a bit about this on the Cortex podcast.
- vinceguidry 11y agoTo make money directly from your audience, your audience has to have money. The one parallel I saw in all of the article's examples is that they're all catering to young kids. I bet someone could make a tidy fortune coming up with a monetization strategy for these artists. My guess is that targeting parents would do the trick.