uh, this is a very pessimistic view on history rewriting. Much more common probably is the fact that one tries to persist very gradually local changes, and onc

uh, this is a very pessimistic view on history rewriting. Much more common probably is the fact that one tries to persist very gradually local changes, and once the dust has settled, submit a much coarser commit. Because most of the time all these "fixup this", "add missing imports" commits are really of nobodies interest any more. If you hold on to a git hash, you are can identify history changes very easily.