The alternative is worse. The US and China produce more CO2, but SA is certainly an enabler of vast environmental damage. They also fund fundamentalist Wahabiis

The alternative is worse. The US and China produce more CO2, but SA is certainly an enabler of vast environmental damage. They also fund fundamentalist Wahabiism throughout the world, which is not only destructive to the environment but to secular governments and people throughout the globe. Given the current negatives of the Kingdom i have come to believe that destabilizing it over the long term is probably better for humanity, even if there is some tangential regional (or even local) effects. ISIS complicates this analysis.