I don't understand why you're arguing about a book you haven't read. > no matter the prestige, they could still be wrong and/or poor researchers and/or poor wr

I don't understand why you're arguing about a book you haven't read. > no matter the prestige, they could still be wrong and/or poor researchers and/or poor writers Sure, but those are generalizations, and they don't apply in this case. As you would know if you could be bothered to read it...